Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology
RU EN






Today: 07.12.2025
Home Issues 2025 Year Issue №4 Ceramics of the Early Iron Age from the Sites of Lake Tukh-Emtor: Results of Technical and Technological Analysis
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Submit paper
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

EBSCO

European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)

Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

Ceramics of the Early Iron Age from the Sites of Lake Tukh-Emtor: Results of Technical and Technological Analysis

Stepanova Nadezhda Fedorovna, Kiryushin Yury Fyodorovich, Rybacov Dmitriy Yuryevich

DOI: 10.23951/2307-6119-2025-4-131-144

Information About Author:

Nadezhda F. Stepanova, Candidate of Historical Sciences, Senior Researcher Barnaul Laboratory of Archaeology and Ethnography of Southern Siberia. Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography SB RAS. Akademika Lavrentieva Ave., 17, Novosibirsk, Russia, 630090. E-mail: nstepanova10@mail.ru; ORCID ID: 0000-0003-4017-5641; SPIN-код: 8725-4163; Scopus Author ID: 57194382332; Research ID: АВА-4422-2020. Yuri F. Kiryushin, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor Department of Archaeology. Ethnography and Museology of the Altai State University. Lenin Ave., 61, Barnaul, Russia, 656049. E-mail: kirill-kirushin@mail.ru; SPIN-код: 8302-3888. Dmitry Yu. Rybakov, Candidate of Historical Sciences, General Director. ООО “Siberian Archeology”. Kommunisticheskiy Ave., 8, office 313, Seversk, Russia, 636000. E-mail: dima0183@yandex.ru; ORCID ID: 0009-0008-9818-8000; SPIN-код: 2828-0784.

This article presents the results of studies on ceramics from the Vasyugan and Sarov stages of the Kulai culture (5th century BC–5th century AD) from the archaeological complex at Lake Tukh-Emtor. Located in Vasyuganye on the left bank of the Middle Ob region, the site includes several settlements containing Kulai ceramics. Using a historical and cultural approach, a technical and technological analysis of ceramics from three sites was conducted. The primary objective was to identify cultural traditions in the selection of raw materials and the preparation of pottery paste, to examine the impressions of the ornamenting tools and understand the features of the working edge, and to compare the results obtained. It was found that all vessels were decorated with several tools, and items decorated with similar tools were identified at different sites. It has been established that highly sanded, iron-rich clays were used in the settlement of Tukh-Emtor II, clay with a medium iron content, and in Tukh-Sigat IV and VII, clay with medium and low iron content. Analysis of the composition and characteristics of natural inclusions in the raw material indicates different but similar clay deposits, apparently taken from the shore of a reservoir, likely Lake Tukh-Emtor. Two traditions were identified in the use of mineral inclusions in pottery paste preparation: 1) without the addition of mineral inclusions; 2) with chamotte. In four settlements, Vasyugan-type ceramics, which comprise chamotte, make up 26.5 %, while Sarov ceramics account for 36 %. Overall, the tradition of making ceramics without mineral inclusions prevails. Kulai sites in the Tomsk region are characterized by the addition of broken stone to the pottery paste, while chamotte is typical for the Priket region. In Vasyuganye, a third tradition has been identified—preparing pottery paste without mineral inclusions. This enables the determination of the direction of population contacts during the study period. In particular, the presence of chamotte vessels in Vasyuganye indicates an influx of people from Priketye with different skills in preparing pottery paste during the Vasyugan and Sarov stages. The small number of ceramics, compared to those of the Bronze Age, clearly indicates that the population of this area in the early Iron Age was relatively small.

Keywords: early Iron Age, ceramics, Kulai culture, Vasyugan, raw material, molding masses, ornament

References:

1. Stepanova N.F., Pletneva L.M., Rybakov D.Yu. Osobennosti iskhodnogo syr’ya i formovochnykh mass drevnei keramiki iz Tomskogo Priob’ya [Features of the raw materials and molding masses of ancient ceramics from the Tomsk Ob region]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Istoriya – Tomsk State University Bulletin. History, 2021, no. 69, pp. 55–61 (in Russian).

2. Kiryushin Yu.F., Maloletko A.M. Bronzovyi vek Vasyugan’ya [Bronze Age of the Vasyuganye]. Tomsk, Izdatel’stvo Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Publ., 1979. 183 p. (in Russian).

3. Kiryushin Yu.F. Eneolit i bronzovyi vek yuzhno-taezhnoi zony Zapadnoi Sibiri [Eneolithic and Bronze Age of the southern taiga zone of Western Siberia]. Barnaul, Izdatel’stvo Altayskogo universiteta Publ., 2004. 295 p. (in Russian).

4. Chindina L.A. Drevnyaya istoriya Srednego Priob’ya v epokhu zheleza (kulaiskaya kul’tura) [Ancient history of the Middle Ob region in the Iron Age (Kulai culture)]. Tomsk, Izdatel’stvo Tomskogo universiteta Publ., 1984. 255 p. (in Russian).

5. Chemyakin Yu.P. Kulaiskaya kul’turno-istoricheskaya obshchnost’ [Kulai cultural and historical community]. II Severnyi arkheologicheskii kongress. Doklady, 24–30 sentyabrya 2006 [II Northern Archaeological Congress. Proceedings, September 24–30, 2006]. Khanty-Mansiysk, Charoid Publ., 2006. Pp. 376–403 (in Russian).

6. Bobrinskii A.A. Goncharstvo Vostochnoi Evropy. Istochniki i metody izucheniya [Pottery of Eastern Europe. Sources and methods of study]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1978. 272 p. (in Russian).

7. Bobrinskii A.A. Goncharnaya tekhnologiya kak ob”ekt istoriko-kul’turnogo izucheniya [Pottery technology as an object of historical and cultural study]. In: Aktual’nye problemy izucheniya drevnego goncharstva [Current Issues in the Study of Ancient Pottery]. Samara, Izdatel’stvo Samarskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta Publ., 1999. Pp. 5–109 (in Russian).

8. Tsetlin Yu.B. Drevnyaya keramika. Teoriya i metody istoriko-kul’turnogo podkhoda [Ancient ceramics. Theory and methods of the historical-cultural approach]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Instituta arkheologii RAN Publ., 2012. 384 p. (in Russian).

9. Tsetlin Yu.B. Keramika. Ponyatiya i terminy istoriko-kul’turnogo podkhoda [Ceramics. Concepts and terms of the historical-cultural approach]. Moscow, IA RAN Publ., 2017. 384 p. (in Russian).

10. Chindina L.A., Yakovlev Ya.A., Ozheredov Yu.I. Arkheologicheskaya karta Tomskoi oblasti [Archaeological map of the Tomsk region]. Vol. 1. Tomsk, Izdatel’stvo Tomskogo universiteta Publ., 1999. 340 p. (in Russian).

11. Stepanova N.F., Kiryushin Yu.F., Rybakov D.Yu. Keramika rannego zheleznogo veka s poseleniya Tukh-Emtor IV (bassein r. Vasyugan) [Early Iron Age pottery from the Tukh-Emtor IV settlement (Vasyugan River basin)]. Teoriya i praktika arkheologicheskikh issledovanii – Theory and Practice of Archaeological Research, 2024, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 142–155. DOI: 10.14258/tpai(2024)36(4).-09 (in Russian).

12. Stepanova N.F., Kiryushin Yu.F., Rybakov D.Yu. Keramika epokhi rannego zheleznogo veka pamyatnikov ozera Tukh-Emtor: rezul’taty tekhniko-tekhnologicheskogo analiza [Early Iron Age ceramics from the Lake Tukh-Emtor sites: results of technical and technological analysis]. Istoricheskii opyt etnokul’turnogo osvoeniya prostranstv Severnoi Evrazii i sopredel’nykh territorii: XIX Zapadno-Sibirskaya arkheologo-etnograficheskaya konferentsiya [Historical Experience of Ethnocultural Development of the Spaces of Northern Eurasia and Adjacent Territories: XIX West Siberian Archaeological and Ethnographic Conference]. Tomsk, 2024. (in Russian). URL: https://zsaek.tsu.ru/file/809#overlay-context= (accessed 11 February 2025).

13. Stepanova N.F., Kiryushin Yu.F., Rybakov D.Yu. Rezul’taty tekhniko-tekhnologicheskogo analiza keramiki kulaiskoi kul’tury s Novovasyuganskogo gorodishcha i poseleniya iz Narymskogo Priob’ya [Results of technical and technological analysis of Kulai culture ceramics from the Novovasyugan fortified settlement and a settlement in the Narym Ob region]. Tomskii zhurnal lingvisticheskikh i antropologicheskikh issledovanii – Tomsk Journal of Linguistic and Anthropological Research, 2022, iss. 2 (36), pp. 160–172 (in Russian).

14. Stepanova N.F., Kiryushin Yu.F., Bogaychuk E.A. Rezul’taty izucheniya keramiki rannei i razvitoi bronzy s poseleniya Tukh-Emtor IV (Vasyugan’e) [Results of the study of Early and Developed Bronze Age ceramics from the TukhEmtor IV settlement (Vasyuganye)]. Problemy arkheologii, etnografii i antropologii Sibiri i sopredel’nykh territorii – Problems of Archaeology, Ethnography and Anthropology of Siberia and Adjacent Territories, 2024, vol. XXX, pp. 760–766. DOI: 10.17746/2658-6193.2024.30.0760-0766 (in Russian).

15. Stepanova N.F., Rybakov D.Yu. Osobennosti iskhodnogo syr’ya i formovochnykh mass drevnei keramiki iz Tomskogo i Narymskogo Priob’ya [Features of the raw materials and molding masses of ancient ceramics from the Tomsk and Narym Ob regions]. In: Problemy arkheologii, etnografii i antropologii Sibiri i sopredel’nykh territorii [Problems of Archaeology, Ethnography and Anthropology of Siberia and Adjacent Territories]. Vol. XXV. Novosibirsk, Izdatel’stvo Instituta arkheologii i etnografii SO RAN Publ., 2019. Pp. 607–613 (in Russian).

16. Selin D.V. Keramicheskoe proizvodstvo kulaiskoi kul’tury v Novosibirskom Priob’e: po materialam mogil’nika Kamennyi Mys [Ceramic production of the Kulai culture in the Novosibirsk Ob region: based on materials from the Kamennyi Mys burial ground]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya, filologiya – Bulletin of Novosibirsk State University. Series: History and Philology, 2021, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 86–96 (in Russian).

stepanova_nadezhda_fedorovna_131_144_4_50_2025.pdf ( 1.73 MB ) stepanova_nadezhda_fedorovna_131_144_4_50_2025.zip ( 1.66 MB )

Issue: 4, 2025

Series of issue: Issue 4

Rubric: ANTHROPOLOGY

Pages: 131 — 144

Downloads: 64

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU