COMBINING FUNCTIONS OF SHAMAN AND STORYTELLER IN THE ORAL TRADITION OF PEOPLES OF SIBERIA
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6119-2022-2-118-126
In Russian ethnography and folklore studies, the question of combining the functions of a shaman and a rhapsode in a comparative aspect at the interethnic level is one of the topical and poorly studied problems. The purpose of the work is to identify mythological, functional and genetic connections between shamans and rhapsodes. In the course of the study, for the first time in Russian science, through a comparative analysis for identifying the universal functions of shamans and storytellers in the tradition of peoples of Siberia, a unified archetype of the syncretic image of a bard was revealed. It has been established that the picture of the world in epic texts among the peoples of Siberia is built according to the traditional shamanic mythological version. For the first time, using specific examples, a comparison is made between epic and shamanic texts recorded both from a rhapsode performing the functions of a shaman and a shaman performing an epic text. The general functions of the shaman and the rhapsode as the heaven’s chosen one, the prophet and the soothsayer, possessing a gift from above, an inspiration, are revealed. The universal motives of the divine gift, involuntary actions, punishability, deprivation are defined. As a result of the study, we come to the conclusion that the functions of the shaman and the rhapsode in the Buryat, Yakut and Tuvan traditions have typological similarities. The ancient functions of a shaman and a rhapsode separated with the development of the oral tradition, but in subsequent generations they could be simultaneously performed mainly by those who have shamanic roots. The Buryats retained the combination of the functions of a shaman and a rhapsode as long as the storytelling tradition was alive. In the Khakass traditions, the functions of the shaman and the rhapsode have completely diverged over time, but our research reveals the rudiments of ancient syncretism.
Keywords: epos, rite, text, mythology, ethnos, cultural universals, syncretism
References:
Abai Geser [King Gesar]. Ulan-Ude: Publishing House of the Buryat State University. 2020. 256 pp. (In Russian)
Dampilova L. S. Shamanskie pesnopeniia buriat: simvolika i poetika [Shamanic Chants of the Buryats: Symbolism and Poetics]. 2nd ed., rev. and add. Moscow: Oriental Literature. 2012. 263 pp. (In Russian)
Dugarov B. S. Skazitel’ P. Petrov i “Hanginskoe pesnopenie” [Narrator P. Petrov and Khangin song]. Mongol aman zohiol, zan ujlijn sudalgaa. Ulaanbaatar, 2007. P. 40–49. (In Russian)
Zhirmunskii V. M. Tiurkskii geroicheskii epos: Izbrannye trudy [Turkic Heroic Epic: Selected Works]. Leningrad: Nauka, Leningrad Branch, 1974. 727 pp. (In Russian)
Kazachinova G. G. Vospominaniia o skazitel’nitse [Memoirs about a Rhapsode]. Anna Vasil’evna Kurbizhekova: k 100-letiiu skazitelia i takhpakhchi). Abakan: [without Publishing House], 2013. P. 8–10 (In Russian)
Kyzlasov L. R. Moj drug – ditja naroda [My friend is a child of the people]. Zhizn’, otrazhennaia v slove (k 80-letiiu M. E. Kil’chichakova). Abakan: Publishing Department HRRIPKiPRO “Rosa”, 1999. P. 40–53 (In Russian)
Mainogasheva V. E. Khakasskie skaziteli i pevtsy. Ocherki, esse o nekotorykh masterakh fol’klora [Khakass Storytellers and Singers. Essays about Some Folklore Masters]. 2nd revised ed. Abakan: [without Publishing House], 2020. 144 pp. (In Russian)
Mukhopleva S. D. K voprosu o sootnoshenii funktsii shamana i skazitelia. Po iakutskim materialam [On the Question of the Relationship between the Functions of the Shaman and the Rhapsode. Based on Yakut Materials]. Problemy etnicheskoi istorii i kul’tury tiurko-mongol’skikh narodov Iuzhnoi Sibiri i sopredel’nykh territorii. Vol. 2. Moscow: RAS, IEA RAS, 1996. P. 70–77 (In Russian)
Putilov B. N. Fol’klor i narodnaia kul’tura: in memoriam [Folklore and Folk Culture: in memoriam]. Saint Petersburg: Petersburg Oriental Studies, 2003. 464 pp. (In Russian)
Rerikh Iu. N. Skazanie o tsare Kesare Lingskom [The Legend of King Kasar of Ling]. Dekorativnoe iskusstvo. Dialog istorii i kul’tury. 1995. № 1–2. P. 19–24. (In Russian)
Sagalaev A. M. Skazitel’ i shaman v traditsionnoi kul’ture altaitsev [Rhapsode and Shaman in the Traditional Culture of the Altaians]. Izvestiia Sibirskogo otdeleniia Akademii nauk. 1985. № 9. Series: History, Philology and Philosophy. Vol. 2. P. 53–56. (In Russian)
Samdan Z. B. Mif v fol’klornoi traditsii tuvintsev (forma bytovaniia, siuzhetnyi sostav, sistema personazhei) [Myth in the Folklore Tradition of Tuvans (Form of Existence, Plot Composition, System of Characters)]. Novosibirsk: Nauka. 2016. 180 pp. (In Russian)
Revunenkova E. V. O nekotorykh istokakh poeticheskogo tvorchestva Indonezii (shaman – pevets – skazitel’) [On Some Sources of Poetic Oeuvre in Indonesia (Shaman – Bard – Rhapsode)]. Fol’klor i etnografiia: u etnograficheskikh istokov fol’klornykh siuzhetov i obrazov: Collection of Scientific Papers. Leningrad: Nauka, Leningrad Branch, 1984. P. 65–70. (In Russian)
Utkin K. D. Predfilosofija olonho: antiteza naturalizma supranaturalizmu [Olonkho’s Pre-philosophy: the Antithesis of Naturalism to Supranaturalism]: sbornik trudov: v 16 kn. Kn. 5. Jakutsk: Bichik, 2004. 278 pp. (In Russian)
Funk D. A. Miry shamanov i skazitelei [The Worlds of Shamans and Rhapsodes]. Moscow. Nauka, 2005. 398 p. (In Russian)
Chudoiakov A. I. Etiudy shorskogo eposa [Etudes of the Shor Epic]. Kemerovo: Kemerovo Book Publishing House, 1995. 214 pp. (In Russian)
Popova A. S. Oloҥkho өidөbүllerin bүdүmүk өi-sanaa aan doidunu anaaryytyn byһyytynan kөrөn yrytyy [Analysis of Оlonkho’s representations from the perspective of mythological worldview (logical-epistemological analysis of the cosmogonic content of Оlonkho) ]. Yakutsk: KhIFU izdatel’skai d’iete, 2018. 121 рр. (In Yakut)
Kara G. (1970). Chants d’un barde mongol. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado. Bibliotheca Orientalis Hungarica. Т. XII. (In English)
Issue: 2, 2022
Series of issue: Issue 2
Rubric: ANTHROPOLOGY
Pages: 118 — 126
Downloads: 431