ADDITIONAL MEANINGS OF CAUSAL MARKERS IN POLYPREDICATIVE CONSTRUCTIONS
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6119-2020-2-18-29
The paper deals with the semantics of causal markers in polypredicative constructions; it is based on an areally and genetically balanced sample of 100 languages (Africa – 14 languages, Eurasia – 8 languages, Southeast Asia & Oceania – 13 languages, Australia & New Guinea – 27 languages, North America – 18 languages; South America – 20 languages; where the number of languages taken from each family depends on its size). The research is based on typologically oriented grammars, language descriptions, corpus data and consultations with language experts. It turns out that apart from their basic causal meaning, causal markers can express other additional meanings in the Reason clause, in the Result clause or in both of them. To my knowledge, a number of these parameters have never been mentioned in typological studies of polypredicative causal constructions. The most frequently mentioned additional meaning was evaluation, widely attested in European languages. Both positive and negative evaluation usually refers to the Reason clause and the Result clause at the same time, but in some cases, it can refer to only one of the clauses. The other parameters include: the degree of control of the Reason and Result; conformity or non-conformity of Result to the hearer’s expectations; the reality/objectivity of Reason; emphasis on the Motive vs. the Causer; greater or smaller temporal distance between the propositions; degree of causal relationship between the propositions; and critical attitude toward the causal relationship in polypredicative constructions. Causal markers can combine two additional meanings as well. The fact that most of the additional meanings were attested in languages of Eurasia and Southeast Asia & Oceania can be explained in two ways. First, the languages of these Macroareas are well-described, and, second, both Macroareas possess a larger number of causal markers, typical of written texts, sometimes having additional semantic features.
Keywords: polypredicative constructions, semantics, reason, motive, consequence, evaluation, control, reality
References:
Årsjö Britten. Konai Reference Grammar. – SIL, 2016.
Boguslavskaya Olga Yu. and Levontina Irina B. Smysly ‘prichina’ i ‘cel'’ v estestvennom yazyke [The meaning of ‘cause’ and ‘goal’ in natural language]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya 2. – 2004. – P. 68–88.
Colson Jacques. Bonnes raisons et causes douteuses: les propositions de cause en anglais et en français. Palimpsestes 7. – 1993. – P. 55–71.
Charnavel Isabelle. Perspectives in causal clauses. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 37(2). – 2018. – P. 389–424.
Cowell Andrew and Moss Sr. Alonzo. The Arapaho Language. – Boulder: University Press of Colorado, 2008.
Donohue Mark. A grammar of the Skou language of New Guinea. – Singapore: National University of Singapore, 2004 (draft).
Foster D. Keith. Paya Kuna. An introductory Grammar. – SIL International, 2011.
Galán Rodríguez Carmen. Las oraciones causales. Propuesta de clasificación. Annuario de estudios filolо́gicos XVIII. – 1995. – Pp. 125–158.
Göksel Aslı and Kerslake Celia. Turkish: A Comprehensive Grammar. – London; New York: Routledge, 2005.
Harms Phillip Lee. Epena Pedee Syntax. Studies in the Languages of Colombia 4. – [Dallas, Texas]: Summer Institute of Linguistics; [Arlington]: University of Texas at Arlington, 1994.
Haspelmath Martin. A Grammar of Lezgian. – Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1993.
Hohulin E. Lou and Hohulin Richard M. Tuwali Ifugao Dictionary and Grammar. – Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines. 2014.
Martins Silvana Andrade. Fonologia e Gramática Dâw. – Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics, 2004.
Mastrangelo Matilde, Ozawa Naoko and Saito Mariko. Grammatica Giapponese. – Milano: Ulrico Noelpli Editore, 2006.
Miestamo Matti, Bakker Dik and Arppe Antti. Sampling for variety. Linguistic Typology 20(2). – 2016 – P. 233–296.
Murane Elizabeth. Daga Grammar. – SIL, 1974.
Oskolskaya Sofia, Fedotov Maksim, Zaika Natalia. Language sample for the typological study of the caritive. A talk presented at workshop Language Sampling: Issues and challenges (Saint-Petersburg, December 20, 2019). (available online: https://8758c237-04fb-44bd-ad99-f82f173b80ae.filesusr.com/ugd/ 752339_82d53d3b0fc 44210beebed44e2ecbe 75pdf, accessed on 2020-02-03).
Pekelis Olga. Prichinnye konstrukcii. 2015. (available online at www.rusgram.ru/ Придaточные_причинные accessed on 2020-02-03).
Pennington Joseph Allen. A study of purpose, result, and causal hypotaxis in early Indo-European Gospel versions. – Ph.D. diss. – Athens (GA): University of Georgia, 2010.
Rijk Rudolf P.G. de. Standard Basque: A progressive grammar. – Cambridge, Mass., London, 2008.
Sohn Sung-Ock S. Cognition, Affect, and Topicality of the Causal Particle -nikka in Korean. In: Patricia M. Clancy (ed.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics. –Vol. 2. – Stanford: Stanford University, 1993.
Tatevosov Sergey G., Lyutikova Ekaterina A., Bonch-Osmolovskaya Anastasiya A. (eds.). Elementy tatarskogo yazyka v tipologicheskom osveshchenii. Misharskiy dialect [Elements of Tatar in a typological perspective. The Mishar dialect]. – Moscow: Buki Vedi, 2017.
WALS — Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.). The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. 2013. (available online at http://wals.info, accessed on 2020-02-03).
( 923.71 kB ) 
( 902.07 kB )
Issue: 2, 2020
Series of issue: Issue 2
Rubric: LINGUISTICS
Pages: 18 — 29
Downloads: 652