PREDICATIVE POSSESSION IN EASTERN KHANTY
The paper overviews the variety of predicative possessive constructions manifested in Eastern Khanty. The aim is to define the most productive and frequent types of the predicative possessive constructions as well as peripheral types. The predicative possession is studied and explained by the interrelation of existential, locational and possessive constructions. The core predicative possessive constructions are existential/locational possessive constructions in which the possessor is locative-marked and the predicate is the verb «to be». The periphreal possessive constructions are the transitive constructions which contain the possession verb with a meaning of «to have, to keep, to hold» as the predicate; the possessive constructions with posture verbs «to sit, to stand, to lie» as predicates; equative/inclusive/attributive proprietive constructions including a very rare type of nominal predicative constructions with the possessive proprietive semantics encoded by the predicative suffix /-aki/. The frequency of existential/locational constructiones is induced by the contact with the Russian language among bilingual speakers. According to the Stassen's typology of predicative possession (Stassen, 2009), in Eastern Khanty the domination strategy is the locational strategy. The have-possessives are sporadically found and are losing their distinctive features due to the expanding distribution of the locational constructions at the present moment. The with-possessive constructions are not included in the study of predicative possession as they have the distinctive features and distrubution which allows using it with motion verbs only.
Keywords: predicative possession construction, predicative possession strategies, Eastern dialects of Khanty
References:
Aikhenvald A. Possession and Ownership: a cross linguistic perspective// Possession and Ownership. A cross-linguistic typology (Aikhenvald A., Dixon R.M.W. (eds.)). – Oxford University Press, 2013. – P. 1–64.
Benveniste E. Obschaja lingvistika [General Linguistics] (ed. by Ju. S. Stepanov) – М.: Progress, 1974. – 446 p. (in Russian)
Filchenko A. Asymmetric Negation in Eastern Khanty and Southern Selkup // Tomsk Journal of Linguistics & Anthropology. – 2013. – № 2 (2). Tomsk: TSPU-Press. P. 29–50. (in Russian)
Filchenko A. Possessive Constructions in Eastern Khanty // Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology. – 2014. – № 1 (3). – P. 83–95. (in Russian)
Filchenko A. Negation in Eastern Khanty. In: Negation in Uralic Languages. M. Miestamo, B. Wagner-Nagy, A. Tamm (eds). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2015. – P. 159–190.
Gulya J. Eastern ostyak chrestomathy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1966.
Heine B. Possession. Cognitive sources, forces and grammaticalization. – Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Honti L. ’HABERE’ «по-уральски» // Linguistica Uralica. – 2008. – Vol. XLIV, № 3. – S. 161–177. (in Russian)
Potanina O., Filchenko A. Russian contact-induced innovations in Eastern Khanty // Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology. – 2016. – № 2(12). – P.27–39. (in Russian)
Potanina O. S. K tipologii atributivnyh posessivnyh konstruktsij na materiale vasjuganskogo dialekta hantyjskogo jazyka [The typology of attributive possession in Eastern Khanty] // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. – Tambov: Gramota, 2014. – № 5(35), Part. 2. – P. 165–169. (in Russian)
Stassen L. Predicative Possession. – New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
( 790.48 kB ) 
( 775.08 kB )
Issue: 4, 2016
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: LINGUISTICS
Pages: 60 — 72
Downloads: 1120