Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology
RU EN






Today: 05.02.2026
Home Search
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
  • Search
  • Rating
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Submit paper
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

EBSCO

European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)

Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

Search

- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
  • - Not selected -

#SearchDownloads
1

The Kumyk-Russian Bilingualism of Children from the Perspective of Schoolchildren and Their Parents. Linguistic and Ethnosocial Aspects // Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology. 2025. Issue 2 (48). P. 50-66

The article presents the third phase of the study of the linguistic and ethnocultural situation of the TerekKumyks in the Republic of North Ossetia–Alania using the example of the Terek-Kumyks of the village of Predgornoye. The choice of this group is due to their high residence (the Terek-Kumyks of Predgornoye village live in the Republic of North Ossetia), the linguistic identity of the Terek-Kumyks living in the village, while they are in constant cultural and linguistic interaction with representatives of other peoples of the village and the republic. In this work, attention was focused on analyzing the Russian-Kumyk bilingualism of the children according to the perceptions of the parents and the children themselves. Quantitative and qualitative sources were used for the study. The team of authors carried out the study in several stages. A survey of children and adults was conducted in August 2023, followed by a survey of school-age children only in February 2024. An in-depth interview with a teacher of the Kumyk language at the school in Predgornoye was used as an additional ethnological source. The article presents the questionnaire results in the form of ‘violin diagrams’ reflecting the indices of the dominance of the use of the Russian or Kumyk language. The researchers compared the data from the first and second questionnaires and the perception of the existence of the Kumyk and Russian languages among the schoolchildren from the perspective of the children themselves and their parents. To clarify the questionnaire material on bilingualism, the children were asked four questions about the observance of Kumyk/Russian holidays and knowledge of folklore. The interview with the Kumyk language teacher enabled us to supplement and partially revise some of the questionnaire data. As a result, the study revealed that there is a twofold situation. On the one hand, the children rate their knowledge of the Kumyk language higher than their parents and, above all, their teacher at school. On the other hand, the adults note that although the children use Kumyk to communicate with each other (during breaks, in the yard, etc.), they have great difficulty when they read literary texts in Kumyk or write their own works. This means that the knowledge of the Kumyk language seems to be exclusively of an everyday nature; the children have a minimum of oral communication. At the same time, they read literature and watch visual contexts, mainly in Russian.

Keywords: language situation, bilingualism, Kumyk-Russian bilingualism, sociolinguistic stydy, ethnological study, intergenerational transmission of language, language vitality

552
2

Semantic Invariant of the Sociative Suffix –lsA in Barguzin Buryat // Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology. 2025. Issue 3 (49). P. 19-28

This article deals with the semantics of the suffix -lsA in Barguzin Buryat. The morpheme originally coded sociative but then also took on the reciprocal function. Field data from Baragkhan ulus (Republic of Buryatia), collected by interviewing local speakers and by elicitation, show that contrary to previous works on Buryat, the Barguzin version of the suffix -lsA does not form traditional assistive clauses and has certain limitations in terms of how a plural argument can be expressed in sociative clauses: essentially, it cannot form sociative clauses in the strict sense, i.e. it does not allow a simple plural noun phrase or coordinated noun phrases as the plural argument. In the paper, the existing meanings of the affix are shown, including different sociative types: subject-oriented, object-oriented, and event-oriented. It has been established that the events described by sociative clauses must be spatially, temporally, and factually related. I argue that all possible meanings of the suffix amount to event plurality as the semantic invariant. Furthermore, the events -lsA refers must be part of the same situation (in the sense of situation semantics). Reciprocal and sociative semantics of different types then result from different possible contextual relations between the events. For example, in the case of a reciprocal clause with two participants, the events share the same set of participants and descriptive properties but differ in the distribution of semantic roles between the participants. Argumentoriented sociative clauses refer to events that have the same descriptive properties but differ in an argument. ‘Attendant action’ -lsA clauses refer to events that may have nothing in common except the basic connection within the situation they both belong to.

Keywords: Buryat, Mongolic languages, sociative, reciprocal, verb semantics, event plurality, pluractionality, semantic invariant, polysemy

320

2026 Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU