Negative Pronouns in Finnic Languages (Based on Materials from the Gospel Translations)
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6119-2024-1-32-43
The article deals with the subset of indefinite pronouns which are often denoted in the literature as negative pronouns in six Finnic languages (Estonian, Finnish, North and Livvi Karelian, Seto and Veps). The data for the study comes from the translations of the Gospel texts into those languages. Negative pronouns are understood as such indefinite pronouns which are used primarily in the scope of negation and in some related contexts (downward-entailing or non-veridical). The distribution of negative pronouns in the text is described. It is shown that different types of negative pronouns are used in these languages. Finnish and North Karelian have a series of negative pronouns formed with the additive operator -kaan (-kana in North Karelian), which is used primarily in negative contexts. It is argued that these pronouns should be analyzed as strong Negative Polarity Items because they could occur in the contexts where an overt marker of negation is not present, such as the scope of adversative predicates, embedded clause of the negated matrix predicate or polar questions. Livvi Karelian and Veps employ pronouns with the prefix ni- borrowed from Russian. These pronouns behave like Negative Concord Items because they occur only in the presence of the clausemate sentential negation marker. Some differences in the distribution of these items are attested. Finally, Seto and Estonian do not have any special series of negative pronouns. Instead, the -gi pronouns, which have a very broad distribution, are used in these contexts. In Estonian, these can be modified by the marker of constituent negation mitte.
Keywords: Finnic Languages, Indefinite Pronouns, Negative Polarity Items, Negative Concord Items
References:
Blockland R. Borrowability of pronouns: evidence from Uralic // Finnisch-Ugrische Mitteilugen. Vol. 35. 2011. P. 1–34.
Brasoveanu A., Farkas D. F. Indefinites / M. Aloni, P. Dekker (eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press. P. 238–266.
Chierchia G. Logic in grammar: polarity, free choice, and intervention. Oxford studies in semantics and pragmatics, 2. Oxford: Oxford university press, 2013.
Gajewski J. R. Licensing strong NPIs // Natural Language Semantics. No. 19 (2). 2011. P. 109–148.
Giannakidou A. Polarity sensitivity as (non)veridical dependency. Linguistik Aktuell, 23. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1998.
Giannakidou A. 64. Negative and positive polarity items / K. von Heusinger, C. Maienborn, and P. Portner (eds.). Vol. 2. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 2012. P. 1660–1712.
Giannakidou A. A critical assessment of exhaustivity for Negative Polarity Items: The view from Greek, Korean, Man-darin, and English // Acta Linguistica Academica. 2018. No. 65(4). P. 503–545.
Giannakidou A., Zeijlstra H. The Landscape of Negative Dependencies: Negative Concord and N-Words // M. Evera-ert and H.C. van Riemsdijk (eds.) The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wi-ley & Sons, Inc., 2017. P. 1–38.
Guerzoni E., Sharvit Y. A question of strength: on NPIs in interrogative clauses // Linguistics and Philosophy. 2007. No. 30(3). P. 361–391.
Haspelmath M. Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Oxford university press, 1997.
Hienonen H. The Implicational Semantic Map for Veps Indefinite Pronouns // Linguistica Uralica. 2010. No. 46(4). P. 281–292.
Kaiser E. Case Alternation and NPIs in Questions in Finnish // WCCFL 21 Proceedings, 2002. P. 194–207.
Karjalainen H. Vepsän kielen paljaiden interrogatiivien indefiniittinen käyttö // Virittäjä. 2016. No. 120(3). P. 360–397.
Karjalainen H. Borrowing morphology // Uralica Helsingiensia [Preprint]. 2019. No. 14.
Karttunen L., Peters S. Interrogative quantifiers / C. Rohrer (ed.) Time, Tense, and Quantifiers. De Gruyter, 1980. P. 181–206.
Lahiri U. Focus and Negative Polarity in Hindi // Natural Language Semantics. 1998. No. 6. P. 57–123.
Lohiniva K. The syntax and semantics of additivity in Finnish. Université de Genève, 2018. URL: https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:115531
Miestamo M., Tamm A., Wagner-Nagy B.B. (eds.) Negation in Uralic Languages. Typological Studies in Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2015.
Pajusalu R. Indefinite determiners mingi and üks in Estonian / E. Mati. (ed.) Estonian: Typological studies IV, 2000. P. 87–117.
Penka D. Negative indefinites. Oxford studies in theoretical linguistics. No. 32. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Penka D. Negative and Positive Polarity Items / M.T. Putnam, B.R. Page (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Germanic Linguistics. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press, 2020. P. 639–660.
Pook H., Lindström, L. The use of the indefinite pronoun keegi “someone” in Estonian dialects // Nordic Journal of Linguistics. 2022. P. 1–32.
Rossyaykin P. Russkiye ni-mestoimeniya litsenziruyutsya nad otritsaniyem [Russian negative pronouns are licensed above Negation] // Rhema. 2021. No. 4. P. 69–118.
Rossyaykin P. Fokusnyy chastitsy i otritsatelnaya polyarnost’ [Focus particles and negative polarity] // Voprosy yazy-koznaniya. 2022. No. 2. P. 30–64.
Rossyaykin P. Sfera deystviya propozitsionalnykh operatorov (na materiale otritsaniya i modal’nosti) [Scope of propo-sitional operators (on the data on negation and modality). Thesis of the kandidat filologicheskikh nauk. MSU, 2022.
Van Alsenoy L.., van der Auwera J. Indefinite pronouns in Uralic languages / M. Miestamo, A. Tamm, and B. Wagner-Nagy (eds.) Negation in Uralic Languages. Typological Studies in Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2015. P. 517–546.
Zeijlstra H. Sentential Negation and Negative Concord. Utrecht: LOT publications, 2004.
Zwarts F. Nonveridical contexts // Linguistic Analysis. 1995. No. 25. P. 286–312.
( 549.35 kB ) 
( 539.3 kB )
Issue: 1, 2024
Series of issue: Issue 1
Rubric: LINGUISTICS
Pages: 32 — 43
Downloads: 645