Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology
RU EN






Today: 14.06.2025
Home Issues 2020 Year Issue №2 THEONYM 'KHAIRKHAN' IN TURKIC-MONGLOLIAN MYTHOLOGY
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Submit paper
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

EBSCO

European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)

Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

THEONYM 'KHAIRKHAN' IN TURKIC-MONGLOLIAN MYTHOLOGY

Dampilova Lyudmila Sanzhiboevna

DOI: 10.23951/2307-6119-2020-2-118-126

Information About Author:

Dampilova Lyudmila Sanzhiboevna, Doktor Nauk, Philology, docent, leading scientist. Institute of Philology Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. dampilova_luda@rambler.ru

In Turkic-Mongolian mythology the most common appealing to the deity during ceremonial actions (veneration of celestial beings, spirits of ancestors, spirits of mountains and fire) is the word khairkhan / kairakan. The article is devoted to the meanings of this word in Turkic and Mongolian rite acts, revealing of their differences depending on traditions, rite action, language features in the diachronic aspect. The analysis of the theonym khayrkhan / kairakan of Mongolian peoples in comparison with Siberian Turks of the Sayan-Altay area from the point of view of preservation and transformation of the code word in the rite tradition seems relevant. The author aims to identify from a semiotic point of view the meaning of the theohym khairkhan, and its connotations, fixed in tradition. The etymology of the word khairkhan in the Mongolian and Turkic languages of the Sayan-Altay area has been considered. The mythological semantics of this word have been studied on material of the rite texts of Mongolian and Turkic peoples. The main denotations, such as the supreme deity, the guardian spirit (spirits of mountains, fire, ongon-spirits), and totem (bear, snake) were revealed. Depending on the cultural experience of the people, the denotation of theonym changes in different language environments, rite tradition and time continuum. It is assumed that strict observance of ritual, prescribed behavior, transmission of formula expressions without changes contributed to preservation of this word as a key word in the memory of the collective. Its mythological background with ancient sacred roots sounds as echo in ritual action. It is established that khairkhan / kairakan is one of the oldest symbols of the deity in the Turk- Mongolian tradition. If one considers the theonym without going beyond the sustainable cultural context, in Turk-Mongolian mythology it is used in its basic denotative meaning as giving mercy. The author concludes that theonym khairkhan / kayrakan, while maintaining its archetypal mythological meaning, is a steady code word in the Turk-Mongolian rite tradition.

Keywords: tradition, mythology, ceremony, worship, deity, spirit, fire, mountain

References:

Bordzhanova T. G. Obryadovaya poeziya kalmykov. Sistema zhanrov, poetika [Ceremonial poetry of Kalmyks. System of genres, poetics]. – Elista: Kalmyckoye kn. izd-vo, 2007. – 588 s. (in Russian)

Galdanova G. R. Evolyuciya predstavlenij o tengri (po tekstam mongoloyazychnykh obryadnikov) [Evolution of images of tengri (according to the texts of Mongolian ceremonials)] // Srednevekovaya kultura Centralnoj Azii: pis’mennye istochniki. – Ulan-Ude: Izd-vo Buryatskogo nauchnogo centra SO RAN, 1995. – S. 94–107. (in Russian)

Dashieva N. B. Tradicionnye obshchestvennye prazdniki buryat: istoriya i tipologii [Traditional public feasts of the Buryats: history and typologies]. – Ulan-Ude: Izd.-poligr. kompleks FGBOU VPO VSGAKI, 2012. – 211 s. (in Russian)

Dugarov D. S. Istoricheskie korni belogo shamanstva (na materiale obryadovogo fol’klora buryat) [Historical roots of white shamanism (on the material of rite folklore of the buryats)]. – M.: Nauka, 1991. – 300 s. (in Russian)

Likhachev D. S. Konceptosfera russkogo yazyka [Sphere of concepts of the Russian language] // Russkaya slovesnost’. Ot teorii slovesnosti k strukture teksta. Antologiya. – M.: Academia, 1997. – S. 280–289. (in Russian)

Mixajlov T. M. Iz istorii buryatskogo shamanizma [From the history of Buryat shamanism]. – Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1980. – 319 s. (in Russian)

Naeva A. I. Altajskij obryadovyj fol’klor: specifika zhanra (etnokul’turologicheskie aspekty) [Altai rite folklore: specificity of genre (ethnoculturological aspects)]. – Barnaul: ARTIKA, 2011. – 125 s. (in Russian)

Sagalaev A. M., Oktyabr’skaya I. V. Tradicionnoe mirovozzrenie tyurkov Yuzhnoj Sibiri. Znak i ritual [Traditional world view of the Turks of Southern Siberia. Sign and ritual]. – Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1990. – 209 s. (in Russian)

Sundueva E. V. Semanticheskaya sfera lyubvi v mongolskikh yazykakh [Semantic Sphere of Love in the Mongolian Languages] // Gumanitarnyj vektor. Ser. Filologiya. Vostokovedenie. – 2016. – T. 11, № 3. – S. 189–193. (in Russian)

Erdenebold L. Tradicionnye verovaniya ojrat-mongolov (konec XIX – nachalo XX vv.) [Traditional beliefs of Oirat-Mongols (late XIX – early XX century)]. – Ulan-Ude: Izd-vo Buryatskogo nauchnogo centra SO RAN, 2012. – 196 s. (in Russian)

Büm-Ochir D. Mongol böögijn zan üjl [Rituals of Mongolian shamans]. – Ulaanbaatar: Mönkhijn üseg, 2002. – 265 p. (in Mongolian)

Pürev O. Mongol böögijn shashin [The belief of Mongolian shamans]. – Ulaanbaatar: ADMON, 1998. – 328 p. (in Mongolian)

Rinchen B. Mongol böögijn duudalga [Invocation of the Mongolian shaman]. – Ulaanbaatar: Zoxiogchijn zövshöörölgüj xevlel, 2013. – 300 p. (in Mongolian)

Sükhbat Sh. Mongol böögijn delgerengüj tol’–III [Vocabulary of Mongolian Shamanism-III]. – Ulaanbaatar: SodNom, 2012. – 407 p. (in Mongolian)

dampilova_l._s._118_126_2_28_2020.pdf ( 1017.15 kB ) dampilova_l._s._118_126_2_28_2020.zip ( 987.31 kB )

Issue: 2, 2020

Series of issue: Issue 2

Rubric: ANTHROPOLOGY

Pages: 118 — 126

Downloads: 1300

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU