PROTOTYPICAL AND NON-PROTOTYPICAL FUNCTIONS OF THE POSSESSIVE MARKERS IN THE SELKUP LANGUAGE
DOI: 10.23951/2307-6119-2017-4-56-63
The paper overviews the various approaches to the definition of the term possession, semantic dissimilarity of the category of possession, detached and attached possession, the main ways to express the category of possession in the Selkup language. In dialects of the Selkup language the possessive relations can be expressed by morphological, morphological-syntactic and syntactic ways. The morphological way to express the possessive relations consists in attaching of the personal-possessive suffixes to nouns or other parts of speech. The predicative possessive constructions of the Selkup language can be divided into five groups, the most frequent of which are the constructions with a noun or a pronoun having a marker -nan and the verb ēqo 'to have, possess' or čaŋkįqo ‘not to have, not to possess’. The possessive markers of the Selkup language express not only possession, but also definiteness; they also perform the indicating, intensifying and distinguishing functions.
Keywords: attributive possession, predicative possession, the Selkup language, deictic functions of the possessive markers
References:
Bekker Je. G., Alitkina L. A., Bykonja V. V., Il’jashenko I. A. Morfologija sel’kupskogo jazyka. Juzhnye dialekty. Chast’ I. [Morphology of Selkup Language. Southern dialects. Part 1.]. – Tomsk: TGU Publ., 1995. – 292 p. (in Russian)
Edygarova S. Kategorija posessivnosti v udmurtskom jazyke [Possession in Udmurt]. URL: www.ut.ee/Ural/ariste/loputood/Edygarova.Dr.pdf (in Russian)
Kategoriya posessivnosti v slavyanskikh i balkanskikh yazykakh [The category of possession in the Slavic and Balkan languages]. – M.: Nauka, 1989. – 262 p. (in Russian)
Kim A. A. Vyrazhenie kategorii pritjazhatel’nosti v dialektah sel’kupskogo jazyka: avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [The Expression of Possession in the Selkup Dialects]. – Tartu, 1987. – 16 p. (in Russian)
Kim-Maloney A. A., Kovylin S. V. Taksonomija jazykovyh sredstv vyrazhenija posessivnosti v sel'kupskom jazyke [Taxonomy of possessive language means in Selkup] // Tomskiy zhurnal lingvisticheskikh i antropologicheskikh issledovaniy – Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology. – 2015. – № 4 (10). – Р. 36–44. (in Russian)
Kuznetsova A. I., Helimskij E. A., Grushkina E. V. Ocherki po sel’kupskomu yazyku. Tazovskiy dialekt [Essays about the Selkup language. Tazovsky dialect]. – M., MGU Publ., 1980. – Vol. 1. – 408 р. (in Russian)
Kuznetsova A. I. Kumulyatsiya grammaticheskikh znachenij v agglyutinativnykh pokazatelej: dejkticheskije funktsii possessiva v ural’skikh yazykakh [Cumulation of grammar meanings in the agglutinate markers: deictic functions of possession in the Ural languages] // International symposium on deictic systems and quantification in languages of Europe and Northern and Central Asia: proceedings. – Izhevsk, 2003. – P. 249–259. (in Russian)
Liperovsky V. P. Posessivnyje konstruktsii v khindi i russkom yazyke [Possessive constructions in the Hindi and Russian languages]. – M.: IVRAN, 2009. – 72 p. (in Russian)
Majtinskaya K. E. Kategoriya lichno-prityazhatel’nosti [Category of personal-possession] // Basics of Finno-Ugric linguistics (issues of origin and development of the Finno-Ugric languages). – M.: Nauka, 1974. – P. 267–278. (in Russian)
Nikolaeva I. Possessive affixes in the pragmatic structuring of the utterance: evidence from Uralic // International symposium on deictic systems and quantification in languages of Europe and Northern and Central Asia: proceedings. – Izhevsk, 2003. – P. 130–145.
Polyakova N. V. Sredstva vyrazhenija posessivnyh otnoshenij v dialektah sel'kupskogo jazyka [The expression of posession in the dialects of Selkup] // Tomskiy zhurnal lingvisticheskikh i antropologicheskikh issledovaniy – Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology. – 2015. – № 4 (10). – Р. 51–54. (in Russian)
Polyakova N. V. Osnovnye sposoby vyrazhenija predikativnoj posessivnosti v dialektah sel'kupskogo jazyka [The main ways of predicative possession expressiom in the Selkup dialects] // Tomskiy zhurnal lingvisticheskikh i antropologicheskikh issledovaniy – Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology. – 2016. – № 4 (14). – Р. 43–49. (in Russian)
Polyakova N. V., Vorobieva V. V. Predikativnyje sredstva vyrazheniya posessivnosti v dialektah sel’kupskogo yazyka [Predicative means for expression of possession in the dialects of the Selkup language] // Intercultural communication: theory and practice: proceedings of the 16th International applied research conference. – Tomsk: TPU Publishing House, 2016. – P. 212–215. (in Russian)
Serebrennikov B. A. K probleme proishozhdeniya prityazhatel’nykh suffiksov v tyurkskikh i ural’skikh yazykakh [The issue of origin of possessive suffixes in the Turkic and Ural languages // Phonetics. Phonology. Grammar. – M.: Nauka, 1971. – P. 277–282. (in Russian)
Syutkina M. Yu. Mezhkategorial’nyje svyazi ekzisteal’nykh i posessivnykh konstruktsij [Intercategorial connections existential and possessive constructions]: Dis. Cand. of Filol. Sc.: 10.02.19 / M. Yu. Syutkina. – Izhevsk, 2004. – 185 p. (in Russian)
Vedotov M. P. Chuvashsko-marijskije vzaimosvyazy [Chuvash-Mari language interconnections]. – Saransk: Saransk University Publishing House, 1990. – 336 p. (in Russian)
Filchenko A., Potanina O. Predicative Possession in Eastarn Khanty // Tomskiy zhurnal lingvisticheskikh i antropologicheskikh issledovaniy – Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology. – 2016. – № 4 (14). Р. 60–72. (in Russian)
Heine B. Possession. Cognitive sources, forces and grammaticalization. – Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1997. – 292 p.
Herslund M., Baron I., Sorenson F. Introduction: Dimensions of possession. Typological studies in language, 47/ I. Baron. – Copenhagen, 2001. – P. 48–62.
Vorobeva V., Novitskaja I., Girfanova K., Vesnin V. Adnominal Possessive Constructions in Narym, Vasjugan and Middle-Ob Dialects of Selkup // Linguistica Uralica. – 2017. – Vol. 53, № 1. – P. 54–64.
Vorobeva V., Fedorinova Z., Kolesnik E. Three Crucial Crises in the Development of the Khanty and Mansi Unique Culture // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. – 2015. – Vol. 206: Linguistic and Cultural Studies: Traditions and Innovations, LKTI. – P. 108–113.
( 677.84 kB ) 
( 664.83 kB )
Issue: 4, 2017
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: LINGUISTICS
Pages: 56 — 63
Downloads: 1442