Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology
RU EN






Today: 15.05.2025
Home Issues 2015 Year Issue №4 TAXONOMY OF POSSESSIVE LANGUAGE MEANS IN SELKUP
  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Bulletin Archive
    • 2025 Year
      • Issue №1
    • 2024 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2023 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2022 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2021 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2020 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2019 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2018 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2017 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2016 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2015 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2014 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
      • Issue №3
      • Issue №4
    • 2013 Year
      • Issue №1
      • Issue №2
  • Rating
  • Search
  • News
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Review Procedure
  • Information for Readers
  • Editor’s Publisher Ethics
  • Contacts
  • Submit paper
  • Subscribe
  • Service Entrance
vestnik.tspu.ru
praxema.tspu.ru
ling.tspu.ru
npo.tspu.ru
edujournal.tspu.ru

EBSCO

European reference index for the humanities and the social sciences (erih plus)

Search by Author
- Not selected -
  • - Not selected -
Яндекс.Метрика

TAXONOMY OF POSSESSIVE LANGUAGE MEANS IN SELKUP

Kim Alexandra Arkad'evna, Kovylin Sergei Vasilievich

Information About Author:

The article observes classification of constructions with possessive markers in Selkup in the frame of such oppositions, as personal – impersonal, adnominal (pronominal and nominal) – predicative, alienable – inalienable, prototypical – non prototypical. 44 examples of Selkup constructions with possessive markers reveal that some of them do not have possessive meaning but rather reflect determination, identifiability, or definiteness. The usage of possessive suffixes with certain noun groups leads to their grammaticalization.

Keywords: possessive constructions, categorization, Selkup, possessive language means, grammaticallization

References:

Chandra P., Kumar R. Alianable – Inalianable Possession Distinctions: From Syntax to Semantics. Indian Linguistics, 2012, 73 (1–4), pp. 35–45.

Collinder B. Comparative Grammar of the Uralic Languages. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell. 1960. 425 p.

Deal, A. R. External possession and possessor raising. The companion to syntax, eds. M. Everaert and H. van Riemsdijk. Wiley-Blackwell, 2nd edition. URL: http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/~ardeal/papers/Deal-syncom.pdf (in print) (Accessed: 18 December 2015).

Evans V., Bergen B., Zinken J. (Editors). Preface. The Cognitive Linguistics Reader. EQUINOX, London, XIII–XIV. 2007.

Filchenko A. Ju. Posessivnye konstrukcii v vostochnyh dialektah hantyjskogo jazyka [Possessive constructions in eastern Khanty]. Tomskiy zhurnal antropologicheskikh i lingvisticheskikh issledovaniy – Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology, 2014, vol. 1 (3), pp. 83–95.

Hammarberg B., Koptyevskaya-Tamm M. Adnominal possession: combining typological and second language perspective. In Giacalone Ramat (ed.), Typology and Second Language Acquisition. Berlin, 2003. pp. 125–180.

Honti, L. ’HABERE’ “po-ural’ski” [’HABERE’ “in Uralic”]. Linguistica Uralica XLIV. 3., 2008, pp. 161–177.

Kim A. A. Habeo-konstrukcii v sel’kupskom jazyke [Habeo-constructions in Selkup]. Jazyki i toponimija – Languages and toponimy, Tomsk, TSU, 1981, pp. 90–94.

Kim A. A. Kategorija pritjazhatel’nosti v sel’kupskom yazyke [Category of possessivity in Selkup]. Kategoriya prityazhatel’nosti v slavyanskikh i balkanskih jazykah: Tezisy soveshhaniya – Category of possessivity in Slavic and Balkan languages: Conference theses, Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1983, pp. 53–55.

Kim A. A. O svjazi kategorii pritjazhatel’nosti s kategoriej opredelennosti v sel’kupskom jazyke [On connection of the category of possessivity with defi niteness in Selkup]. Jazyki i toponimiya – Languages and toponimy, Tomsk, TSU Publ., 1980. Pp. 100–106.

Koptjevskaja-Tamm M. Adnominal possession. Language typology and language universals. An international handbook. Ed. by Haspelmath Martin. Volume 2, 2001. pp. 960–970.

Koptjevskaja-Tamm M. Adnominal Possession in the European Languages. In: Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF), Vol. 55, no. 2, 2002. pp. 141–172.

Langacker R. W. The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, 2002. 393 p.

Lingvisticheskij jenciklopedicheskij slovar’ [Linguistic encyclopedic dictionary]. Adit. Jartseva V. N. Moscow, Sovetskaja intsiclopedia. 1990.

Milovanova, M. V. Ponjatie posessivnosti: problemy opredelenija i struktury [The concept of possessivity: problems of identifi cation and structure]. Vestnik VolGU – Vestnik VolSU, 2. Issue. 6, 2007, pp. 95–101.

Nikolaeva I. Possessive affi xes as markers of information structuring: Evidence from Uralic. In: Bernard Comrie and Pirkko Suihkonen (eds.) International Symposium on Deictic Systems and Quantifi cation. Izhevsk. 2003. URL: http://ling.uni-konstanz.de/pages/home/nikolaeva/papers/izhevsk.pdf (Accessed 18 December 2015).

Stassen L. Predicative Possession. In: Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. 2013. Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/117 (Accessed 18 December 2015).

Payne Doris L., Barshi, Immanuel (editors). External Possession. Typological Studies in Language (TSL), Volume 39. John Bebjamins Publishing Company. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia, 1999.

Selivanova, E. A. Kategorizaciya posessivnosti v russkom soznanii i yazyke [Categorization of possessivity in Russian consciousness and language]. Uchenye zapiski Tavricheskogo nacional’nogo universiteta im. V. I. Vernadskogo. Serija “Filologija. Social’nye kommunikacii” – Scientifi c notes of Tavrida National V. I. Vernadsky University/ “Philology. Social communications”, vol. 25 (64), no. 1. Part 1. 2012. Pp. 410–416.

Wagner-Nagy B. Posessivnye konstrukcii v nganasanskom [Possessive constructions in Nganasan]. Tomskiy zhurnal antropologicheskikh i lingvisticheskikh issledovaniy – Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology, 2014, no. 1 (3), pp. 76–82.

kim-maloni_a._a._36_44_4_10_2015.pdf ( 437.16 kB ) kim-maloni_a._a._36_44_4_10_2015.zip ( 429.73 kB )

Issue: 4, 2015

Series of issue: Issue 4

Rubric: LINGUISTICS

Pages: 36 — 44

Downloads: 1331

For citation:


© 2025 Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology

Development and support: Network Project Laboratory TSPU